Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Maria Shmakova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Jul at 05:25 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
R. Marie Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova

NED
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nijkamp 1 - 0 Shmakova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rose Marie Nijkamp winning 2 and Maria Shmakova winning 0. The last match between Rose Marie Nijkamp and Maria Shmakova was at the W35 Casablanca, 15-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Rose Marie Nijkamp getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nijkamp | 1 |
| Shmakova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Casablanca(07-15-25)
R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.38% (38-26) | Career Total W/L | 56.25% (27-21) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova Match Preview:
- Nijkamp has shown a stronger second serve performance recently, winning 38.6% of their second serve points, slightly ahead of Shmakova's 36.11%. Could this slight edge contribute to a match win?
- In return games, Nijkamp also leads, winning 58.68% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Shmakova's 57.56%.
- When returning first serves, Nijkamp again has the advantage, with a 36.13% success rate versus Shmakova's 33.33%.
- Despite the return game edge, under pressure, Shmakova excels by saving 50.68% of breakpoints, surpassing Nijkamp’s 43.75% breakpoint save rate.
- According to last year's performance, Nijkamp has a higher match win rate at 63.33%, compared to Shmakova's 55.26%, showing stronger overall performance.
- Both players have their best surface on clay, with Shmakova having a slightly better win percentage of 65% compared to Nijkamp's 62% on this surface. Shmakova also performs better on hard surfaces.
- Nijkamp has faced opponents with a higher average ranking (152.87), suggesting more competitive experience compared to Shmakova's average opponent ranking of 477.93.
- In deciding sets, Nijkamp demonstrates remarkable resilience, winning 80% compared to Shmakova’s 33% win rate in similar scenarios.
- Both players are nearly equal in breakpoint conversion rates, with Shmakova holding a marginal advantage at 36.36%, over Nijkamp’s 36.11%.
Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):
Nijkamp's slight lead in second serve performance and notable success in return games highlight their technical strengths on the court when it comes to capitalizing on opponent's serves.
Although Shmakova excels in saving breakpoints and has shown proficiency on both clay and hard courts, Nijkamp’s overall superior performance and experience playing higher-ranked opponents make them a formidable contender in matchups.
Considering the deciding set performances, where Nijkamp dominates, the likelihood swings in their favor if the match tightens.
Despite Shmakova’s competencies, Nijkamp’s all-around edge in performance metrics positions them as the probable winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Rose Marie Nijkamp vs Maria Shmakova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2:7:41 | Average Match Time | 2:7:41 |
| 89% (55/62) | 1st Serve % | 90% (73/81) |
| 60% (33/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (29/73) |
| 29% (2/7) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 58% (47/81) | Return Points Win % | 44% (27/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
R. M. Nijkamp Recent Matches Played
M. Shmakova Recent Matches Played

R. M. Nijkamp vs M. Shmakova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.38% (38/26) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.25% (27/21) |
| 58.90% (86/60) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.27% (63/47) |
| 53.46% (711/619) | Games Win/Loss | 53.57% (563/488) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 64.00% (32/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.54% (16/10) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 55 | Aces Total | 43 |
| 0.65 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 425 | Total Double Faults | 98 |
| 1:41:23 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 394.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 146.63 |
| 61% (2523/4118) | 1st Serve % | 61% (951/1563) |
| 60% (1510/2523) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (575/951) |
| 40% (636/1595) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (261/612) |
| 52% (301/577) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (82/173) |
| 50% (2029/4083) | Return Points Win % | 45% (656/1470) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 62.86% (22/13) | Futures W/L | 59.52% (25/17) |
| 59% (38/64) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (26/47) |
| 38% (3/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (4/7) |
| 44% (8/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (5/15) |
| 87% (39/34) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (31/25) |
| 13% (39/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (31/6) |
| 16% (25/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |